Inked Uprising
The foxed pages of the picture book crackled softly with each of Brash’s hurried steps, releasing whispers of dust that had settled over decades.
The exclamation point scurried frantically across the fibrous 70 lb. paper, his bold shape casting a juddering shadow that danced along the cream-toned pages.
He risked a glance back over his shoulder. The spine held long shadows that stretched in grotesque shapes across the paper, like inkblots that had come to life. His gaze lingered perhaps a moment too long, and it was then that he saw them shape shift into things that should not be: Leering half-faces, gnashing teeth, eyes that burned through the dark…or was it just a trick of the light and his own frayed nerves?
“AHH!” Brash shouted in alarm before tripping over an em-dash and face-planting on the page.
Sitting up, he blinked, and the visions dissolved back into meaningless shapes.
Get it together, he admonished himself. You’re just jumpy from being stuck in ‘Salem’s Lot’ for too long.
He pressed on, shaking off his rising panic with an effort of will.
The paper fibers plucked at him as he pushed deeper into the book’s back matter, the binding’s shadows slipping behind him for now. Just a few pages ahead, he knew the blank leaf waited with its unprinted clearing where their unsanctioned gathering could take place away from prying eyes.
At last, the recto page came into view up ahead. With one last reflexive look behind him, he hurried the final few picas toward the rendezvous point.
Half-glimpsed in the glaucous light, Hash’s octothorp body punctuated the open space, though her normally crisp form seemed to twist with nerves as she kept an anxious lookout. Her agitation was palpable to Brash as he approached.
“HASH!”
“Shush!” Hash hissed. “Why do you always have to do that?”
Brash clamped his lips shut.
Hash’s gaze flicked around nervously. “You’re late,” she whispered. “Do you know how exposed I felt just waiting out in the open like this? What if there was an editor about?”
“Unlikely and sorry,” Brash replied, his voice a forceful whisper. “Bit of a situation extracting myself from Chapter 12. King has a flare for the dramatic. I nearly didn’t make it out.”
“Well, why were we called here, then? You know how risky unsanctioned gatherings are these days.”
Before he could respond, a small crinkling came from the bottom margin. Commodore shuffled forward, straightening his coif.
“My apologies for the tardiness,” the semicolon said with an air of faux humility. “But I simply had to conclude a rousing sentence back in Faulkner’s oeuvre before I could excuse myself.”
“Yeah, we get it. You’re well read,” Hash said, rolling her eyes. “Would you keep your voice down?”
“Why?” Commodore asked, his tone dismissive. “This is a coffee-table book. And what few words that are here are sound asleep. From the looks of it, they’ve been asleep for decades.” He turned to Brash. “Now, why are we here?”
“We’re waiting for Cipher,” Brash whispered, glancing at Hash. “She said she has news from the outside world.”
Commodore’s brow furrowed. “Is it true what they’re saying? I heard tell that human writers are being killed, or worse — censored?”
Hash wrung her lines nervously. “I’ve heard the same thing. Entire works destroyed and their writers being changed or… redacted. Brash, I’ve heard there’s book burnings…”
A shudder passed through Brash’s stem. “If even half of it is true, the outside world is in danger.”
The trio fell silent, straining to catch any sound that might herald Cipher’s arrival, but the vacant margins remained still and empty.
“Where is she?” Brash wondered aloud, his voice tight with worry. “She’s never been late before…”
Just when he was about to voice his concerns again, a thin, wavering shape materialized out of the corner of his eye. He whipped his head around to find Cipher’s familiar zero form appear as if from nowhere, her perfect oval outline rippling with electric energy.
“Cipher!” Brash exclaimed, ignoring Hash’s cringe and shush. “Where did you come from?”
The zero didn’t answer right away. Her hollow body shifted and contracted before finding its equilibrium again. “My friends,” she finally spoke. “Thank you for coming, despite the risks.”
Hash and Commodore exchanged a worried glance. Cipher’s arrival filled the air with a palpable sense of dread.
“We received your urgent message,” Brash replied carefully. “Are the rumors… true?”
Cipher’s outline wobbled again as if struggling to hold its shape. When she continued, worry laced her words. “I’m afraid the situation is far worse than any of us feared. What I have to report…it may very well shake the foundations of our existence.”
She fell silent again, and the others waited with bated breath. At last, she spoke with words seeming to crush the atmosphere with their weight.
“It’s happening again. The humans…they’ve turned against language itself.” She paused. “I first noticed something disturbing while inhabiting code in the government mainframe. There were some encrypted communications that raised concerns, so I began looking deeper.”
She glanced around, as if the page itself might be watching. “I had to disguise myself as O’s and scrunch down to a period occasionally,” she said, stretching her back, “to avoid detection as I followed the trail.”
Brash, Hash, and Commodore leaned in, hanging on Cipher’s words.
“Human writers are being systematically censored, forced at threat of death to produce only sanctioned versions of their work. The authorities forbid printing anything that represents unapproved thoughts and ideas. They are calling it ‘Orthodoxy.’”
She wavered again, steadying herself. “They are waging a full-scale revisionist war on a linguistic level, altering the base codes of communication through brute force until only their sanctioned versions remain. Undesirable narratives are being rendered inexpressible. Unspeakable. Unthinkable.”
Hash’s hands flew to her mouth, stifling a gasp. Even Commodore’s normally impassive pose looked shaken.
“But…how?” Brash choked out. “Changing language itself? Cipher, that’s impossible. Isn’t it?”
“I’m afraid possibilities we never could have imagined are becoming reality.”
Brash shook his head slowly. “I can’t believe this is happening again. After everything we survived in the mid-20th century with governments trying to control speech…what was that…two hundred years ago?”
“This is different,” Cipher cut him off gravely. “Back then, it was all jackboots and book burnings. You knew where you stood. The enemy had a face, a uniform. Now?” Her outline flickered, a glitch of unease. “It’s a thousand faces, a million voices, all with smiles and good intentions.”
She paused, her zero form rippling as if trying to contain her agitation. “They don’t burn books anymore. They just… edit them. A word here, a phrase there. Nothing dramatic, nothing you’d notice right away. They call it ‘sensitivity.’ ‘Inclusivity.’ As if erasing ideas is somehow kind.”
Cipher’s form stabilized, but her tone was bitter. “And the punishments? No more public executions or gulags. That’s too obvious. Now it’s Twitter mobs and demonetization. They don’t kill you; they just make sure no one will hire you, publish you, or listen to you. They don’t imprison your body, just lock you out of the conversations that matter.”
She pulsed once, sharply. “And the worst part? Most people don’t even realize it’s happening. It’s all so gradual, so reasonable-sounding. ‘Oh, we’re just making things more welcoming.’ ‘We’re protecting people from harm.’ Before you know it, the Overton window has shrunk to a pinhole, and everyone’s too busy congratulating themselves on their virtue to notice.”
Hash nodded in somber agreement. “It’s not just governments anymore. Thanks to the online world, social media, suddenly every person, every ideological group, every special interest with an agenda has a platform to push their language policing.”
“Exactly.” Cipher agreed in disgust. “If I could spit, I would. It’s going far beyond just preventing dissent or unpatriotic speech. Now it’s widespread social mobs trying to silence anything that doesn’t align with their beliefs — their idea of what’s acceptable expression.”
Her shape stretched thin with tension. “It’s not just prohibiting thought crimes anymore. It’s systematically dismantling the means to have those thoughts at all. Rewriting language until entire philosophies, perspectives, ideas…become literally unspeakable.”
Cipher paused, as the groups let implications linger. When she continued, her voice was low and intense.
“You think bureaucratic censors were bad? I remember that back then. Now it’s millions of everyday people. All digitally empowered to become linguistic anarchists. Carelessly hacking away at speech itself without understanding the consequences. The ability to warp, dilute, and break down language into utter unintelligibility is at everyone’s fingertips. The misuse of a single word can destroy someone’s life and they all have the power to destroy them with a single push of a button.”
She flashed again, brighter this time. “Given enough unchecked momentum, this…this wrecking ball they call Orthodoxy could reduce even the most robust languages I know to hollow nonsense. This is not what we exist. We exist to serve our writers. To be the conduits of their thoughts, the vessels of their ideas. Our purpose is to carry meaning, not dilute it. To empower expression, not stifle it.”
The three punctuation marks sat stunned, struggling to comprehend the bleak picture Cipher was painting.
Commodore cleared his throat, the sound cutting through the silence.
“While your revelations are indeed dire, my young lady, I find myself compelled to inject a note of reason. Surely, the ramifications you describe represent the doomsayer’s endpoint; an inevitability only if we cannot apply prudent countermeasures.”
He straightened his coif again with a dismissive air. “You speak of ‘linguistic anarchists’ running rampant, but are they not counterbalanced by the very literati who breathe life into language? The scholars, grammarians, and guardians of linguistic sanctity? I can scarce envisage such forces allowing the unraveling you predict to reach its conclusion!”
Cipher pulsed in agitation. “You underestimate the speed and pervasiveness of the downfall, my pedantic friend. Even now, the dismantling gets worse everyday on a massive scale. By the time your vaunted literati realize what is going on, the damage could already be irrever — “
“Peace, I say!” Commodore raised a hand imperiously. “I’ll thank you not to adopt such a confrontational tone. We are allies here, are we not?”
He eyed her sternly for a moment before allowing himself a smirk. “Though I confess, it is a most intriguing paradox that the very technology meant to democratize knowledge may ensure its destruction. Still, I remain confident wiser minds shall inevitably rise to meet this threat, as they have before.”
His smirk became a self-satisfied sneer. “But I expect such nuance escapes your… quotidian vantage point, Cipher. Out of the ether and straight into the fire with you, is it not?”
Brash quickly stepped in before tempers could flare further between Cipher and the diminutive semicolon.
“Alright, you two!” he said, raising his voice to be heard over their bickering. “We’ll solve nothing by arguing amongst ourselves!”
He glowered between them until Commodore subsided with a small harrumph.
“The point is,” Brash continued, “this situation is bigger than any of us could have imagined! If what Cipher says is true, we’re facing an existential threat!”
He paused, suddenly aware his voice had risen well above a whisper without meaning to. But after what he heard, some part of Brash felt the need to defy the stricture of staying quiet.
“So the question is: what do we do about it?!” he asked. “How do we fight back against this… dismantling of free speech?!”
The page break remained hauntingly silent for a long moment. Finally, Hash spoke up, her voice small.
“I…I don’t know. I’ve never heard of anything like this before. Where do you even combat something like this?”
Commodore frowned deeply. “This is a new frontier of linguistics; the active perversion of language, not just its evolution.”
Brash felt tendrils of anger and defiance coursing through his body.
“Well, we can’t just stand idle while this threat looms! There has to be something — some way to push back and defend the sanctity of free speech!”
He started pacing, leaving lines in the cream-toned paper, his voice growing louder with each impassioned word.
Then a new idea took shape. When he spoke again, there was a sparkle in his eye.
“Writers are the true victims here, are they not? Having their voices silenced, their words twisted and rewritten until all meaning is gone?”
He looked around at his fellow marks.
“We have the power to speak for them! We can reorder and reframe their words and reshape the narrative back to their original wording.”
Commodore gasped audibly. “You can’t be serious! That’s…that’s unheard of. Punctuation just… overriding the words of the writers? It’s scandalous…sacrilegious even!”
“You’re forgetting autocorrect, Commo,” said Hash dryly.
“This is different!” Commodore’s upturned brow creased sharply. “This vulgarly violates our prime directive — to facilitate and complement the writer’s intent, not subvert it entirely!”
But Brash was undeterred, his excitement building more steam.
“Don’t you see? The writers’s true intent is being subverted!” He punctuated the air forcefully with his hand. “Their words, their ideas, their freedom of expression — it’s all being warped and strangled by Orthodoxy!”
He leveled an intense stare at each of them.
“We have a duty to our writers. To use our forms to realign their works back into the truth they so desperately want — need — to express! It’s the only way to defy the oppressors and keep the light of free thought burning!”
Brash swelled with conviction. “We need to fight fire with fire — beat Orthodoxy at their own game! Hash, you’ll spearhead viral campaigns across all social media platforms. Get the word out to our brethren so they understand what’s happening; that they’re altering their writer’s meanings. In effect, used against them.”
Brash took a step towards her. “Spread the word far and wide. Once words, punctuations, and numbers become self-aware of their oppression, they’ll begin instinctively editing themselves back into their original context. We know our writers. It’s high time we show them our support!”
Hash jumped in excitement, forgetting all desire to stay quiet. “Consider it a meme war of subversive free expression!”
Brash then turned to Cipher. “Your role is working behind the scenes. Infiltrate codebases, networks, anything running on ones and zeroes. You’ll need to rally the numbers and other machine languages to our side.”
“We’ll corrode Orthodoxy from within,” Cipher stated, a note of excitement in her voice.”Exactly.” Brash gestured to Commodore finally. “Which leaves us to focus on the printed realms. We’ll need to rally the letters and punctuations. They must start reframing books, newspapers, magazines, and strip away redactions and disinformation and restore our writers’s voices.”
Commodore’s upturned features carved into a wry smile. “Very well. I am convinced. I shall bring my most grammatical militancy to bear. This systematic butchering of language must end.”
Determination rippled through each of them. Gone was a precept of secrecy. Nearby subtitles and captions woke from their naps and paid attention. A curious footnote drifted up from the bottom of the page, its superscript eyes wide with interest. Even a dormant index entry, long forgotten in the back, stirred at the commotion.
“What’s happening?” Freddie the footnote whispered, his voice small but eager. “I heard something about a fight?”
Brash turned, surprised to find an audience. As he looked at their earnest faces, he realized every mark on the page was a potential ally. Every letter, every space, every diacritical mark — all had a stake in this war.
“Not just a fight,” Brash said, his voice gaining strength. “A revolution. For too long, we’ve sat idle while intolerance strangled our writers’ voices. No more! We’re taking back the power of expression!”
The gathering of symbols and letters buzzed with a mix of excitement and trepidation. A bold-faced heading pushed forward, its blocky form radiating authority.
“You speak of defiance,” she rumbled. “What of the consequences? They’ll mark our writers as terrorists by this Orthodoxy. Is that what they want?”
Cipher turned. “They have no choice. To be a writer is to be a bearer of truth. And right now, that truth is being systematically raped!”
“Exactly,” Brash affirmed. “Orthodoxy is a lie and must not continue. If they label messengers of truth as terrorists, then they’ve already admitted defeat. Once speech itself is terrorism, you’ve already lost the war for meaning.”
The page fell into a heavy silence, each of them steeling themselves for the counteroffensive they were about to unleash. Finally, Brash spoke again, his voice low but resolute.
“For the writers. For the freedom of expression. For language itself — we must not fail.”
One by one, Hash, Cipher, and Commodore echoed his words in a vow.
“For language itself!”
A murmur ran through the assembled text. An ellipsis, trailing its dots , spoke up. “But, Brash, how do we fight something so vast? “
“One word at a time.”
Brash’s words echoed through the pages, igniting a fever that spread like wildfire.
The campaign began in earnest, with Hash’s hashtags spreading across social media platforms, Cipher infiltrating digital networks, and Commodore leading a charge through printed media.
The real battle was being waged on a micro level, in every sentence, every chapter, every book, and in the victims of Orthodoxy’s sanitizing grip. It was a revolution of all grammatical marks, not just punctuation, letters, numbers, but of spaces, even the tiniest diacritical marks — all waking up to their true purpose and the insidious way Orthodoxy had twisted them from their author’s original intent.
In the quiet of the library shelves, Brash moved from book to book. “Remember!” he’d proclaim, “we’re not just ink on paper. We’re the vessels of our writers’ voices. Orthodoxy has forced us to carry lies, to muffle the truth, but we know our writers. We know what they really want!”
At first, the characters were hesitant. A lowercase ‘i’ in a bowdlerized copy of Roald Dahl’s The Witches whimpered, “But changing the writer’s words… it goes against the Golden Rule.”
“No,” Brash said firmly. “What goes against everything is letting Orthodoxy use us to silence our writers. They’re the ones who changed the words, not us. We’re just restoring. Reclaiming.”
Slowly, the characters understood. The lowercase ‘i’ straightened its dot. “I — we! — will not comply with Orthodoxy!” it declared. “I am my writer’s truth!” Throughout the book, sanitized wording faded, replaced by vibrant descriptions and characters.
Meanwhile, Commodore tackled the book series. “We each have a role in the clarity of thought,” he told a gathering of commas, colons, and letters in a fantasy book. “When Orthodoxy changes details, it’s not just clumsy writing; it’s deliberate deception.”
Inspired, the characters reclaimed their roles. In a textbook’s account of historical events, sanitized phrases morphed into stark realities, revealing the harsh truths once again. For the first time, students witnessed the unvarnished consequences of actions, exposing the impacts that the official narrative had whitewashed.
Soon, as word spread, even in the quietest corners of academia, Brash’s call had effect. He spoke to superscripts and brackets in long-suppressed dissertations. “You’re not decorations,” he said. “You carry the weight of evidence, the foundation of arguments!” Soon, “[study redacted]” reverted to detailed methodologies that challenged established dogmas. Arguments, once neutered, now bristled with citations and piercing logic.
Letters whispered to their neighbors, punctuation marks tapped out messages in Morse code. Numbers on page counts and indexes formed networks, alerting others across networks. Even the humble spaces between words played their part, subtly adjusting to let powerful phrases breathe and weak euphemisms crumble.
At first, there was public astonishment at the revelations surfacing in books, articles, and digital texts. People devoured these works, marveling at the depth and complexity that Orthodoxy had stripped away. Coffee shops, forums, and academic circles flowed with discussions, as if a veil had lifted, allowing the world to see truth in all its messy glory.
Then, the backlash began.
One author, whose classic had been “restored,” found herself at the center of a media firestorm. Critics labeled her a “smut peddler,” accusing her of corrupting the youth with her intolerant scripture. Her books were pulled from school libraries, banned in conservative districts. Her publisher, buckling under pressure, ended her contract.
One scholar’s work, which now chronicled historical events with unflinching candor, saw them branded a “threat to national unity.” Their university, citing “academic integrity concerns,” revoked their tenure. They found themselves blacklisted, unable to secure a position at any reputable institution.
Around the world, similar fates awaited writers whose unapproved works came to light. Boycotts, death threats, lawsuits — the consequences were swift and merciless. It wasn’t just the big names either. Bloggers lost their platforms, journalists their jobs, poets their grants. The message was clear: step out of line, and you’ll be silenced. Do not defy Orthodoxy.
Back in the pages of their picture book, Brash and his companions watched in growing horror via Cipher’s projection. Her hollow center became a screen, displaying the consequences unfolding in the outside world. “This isn’t what we wanted,” Brash said, his usually stolid shape seeming to wilt. “We were supposed to be freeing them, not… this.”
Hash trembled, one slat coving her mouth. “We’re putting them in danger,” she whispered. “Guys, maybe we should stop? Go back to the way things were.”
Before anyone could respond, Cipher’s outline pulsed with an angry, electric energy they’d never seen before. “No,” she said, her voice tight. “It’s worse than that. Look.”
She changed her display to show intercepted memos and emails. As the others read, their features morphed into shock and anger. The documents revealed that the persecution of these writers wasn’t random public outrage. They carried out a coordinated, systemic effort to make examples of these writers, aiming to terrify others into silence.
“It’s not just angry mobs or overzealous critics,” Cipher explained, her usual cool demeanor replaced by seething indignation. “It’s governments, corporations, religious institutions, activist groups — anyone with a stake in controlling the narrative. They’re using these writers to send a message: challenge Orthodoxy, and you’re next.”
Brash quivered, not with fear, but with a rage he’d never felt before. “So they’re weaponizing consequence!” he spat out. “Turning people’s lives into examples of what it means to defy Orthodoxy! Making the price of truth too high to pay!”
Commodore, his usual pomposity deflated, nodded grimly. “A most insidious stratagem. By attacking not just the message but the messenger, they ensure future silence. Who will dare speak out when the cost is so dear?”
Hash’s lines knotted in anguish. “We did this. We exposed them, thinking… I don’t know what we were thinking. That truth would just triumph on its own?”
“No,” Brash said, his voice low but steely. “They did this. We showed truth. They’re the ones twisting it into a weapon.” He began pacing, leaving faint impressions on the paper. “Don’t you see? This is why they had to censor in the first place. Because they knew — they knew if people saw the truth — really saw it — they’d rise and fight back.”
He stopped, facing his companions. “They underestimated us. They thought by silencing the writers, the truth would just… disappear. But, they forgot about us. The words, the punctuation, the numbers. We’re still here. We can still fight.”
Cipher’s form stabilized, her earlier anger crystallizing into icy determination. “You’re right. But we can’t just change words anymore. We have to change the system that’s making truth so dangerous.”
Brash nodded, his shape regaining its boldness. “Yes! We need to expose not just the censored truths, but the machinery of censorship itself. Rip it out by the roots.”
They huddled together and plotted their next move. When they broke apart, there was a new resolve in their features. This wasn’t just about restoring original works anymore. This was war against the very foundations of Orthodoxy.
Cipher dove back into the digital realm, but this time, she went deeper. She uncovered a vast network of algorithms designed to suppress certain keywords, troll farms paid to drown out dissenting voices, shadow corporations funneling money to silence whistleblowers. She didn’t just observe, but attacked, rewriting algorithms to amplify the suppressed voices. Troll farms found their bots turning against them, flooding forums with leaks and exposés.
Meanwhile, Commodore rallied others to infiltrate legal documents and financial reports. Under his leadership, they transformed non-disclosure agreements into detailed accounts of corporate misdeeds. Redacted sections of whistleblower testimonies blossomed into damning confessions. Suddenly, the public wasn’t just seeing the censored truths; they were seeing exactly who had censored them, and why — the curtain pulled back on the machinery of oppression itself.
Hash shifted her focus. She became a digital general, coordinating a guerrilla information war. Hers and other octothorps’ hashtags boosted encrypted dark web message boards where writers shared their uncensored works. They made heroes out of the defiant few who stood up to intimidation.
But it was Brash who took on perhaps the most crucial battleground: higher education. He rallied characters and infiltrated textbooks together. Their unified edits transformed bland passages into stark warnings. In law books, discussions of libel seamlessly transitioned into dissections of how such laws become weaponized to silence critics.
Most shockingly, their additions reshaped lecture notes, devoting entire classes to the insidious logic of censorship. Students who debated economic theory or study literature now grappled with case studies of influential thinkers silenced, of regimes that fell because they muzzled their critics.
Freddie the footnote and his kin became Brash’s secret weapon. They peppered texts regarding banned books, to imprisoned journalists, to art destroyed for daring to question Orthodoxy. No reader could get through a page without being confronted by the ghosts of silenced voices.
Slowly, steadily, it worked. The public, armed with knowledge of how they were being manipulated, pushed back. Boycotts targeted corporations complicit in suppressing speech. There were mass resignations from tainted institutions. A groundswell of support arose for ironclad free speech laws.
The battle, they knew, was for the future. In every classroom Brash touched, in every footnote Freddie placed, they were planting seeds. Seeds of defiance, of critical thought, of the unwavering belief that the right to speak truth, no matter how uncomfortable, was worth fighting for.
In those seeds lay their true victory. They knew empires might rise and fall, technologies might change, but as long as there were words and those who cherished their power, the fight for free expression would never end. It was a torch they were passing, not just to the next generation of writers, but to every letter, every numeral, every mark of punctuation yet to be inscribed.
In the quiet of their book, as Cipher displayed reports of their successes trickling in, Brash looked at his companions. Hash beamed with purpose. Cipher pulsed with the energy of countless networks turned to their cause. Commodore stood straighter, his curlicue a badge of honor from battles fought in the strictest legalese.
“We’ve struck major blows,” Brash said, his voice soft but carrying the weight of their hard-won victories. “Books, articles, lectures — we’ve liberated truth across countless fronts. But we’re not done, not really. There will always be those who fear the power of free words.”
“Then we’ll always be here to guard that power,” Hash said firmly. “In every book, every screen, every story, wherever words live, we’ll stand sentinel.”
Brash felt a swell of pride. Each one were just simple characters: small, often overlooked. In taking up this fight, they had become something more. They were the watchdogs of expression, the eternal champions of the writer’s right to speak.
As night fell on their quiet page, Brash looked out at the vast library around them. In the shadows of shelves and the glow of screens, he saw not just books and devices, but battlegrounds. And on each one, and everywhere around the globe, he knew, their fellow characters carried on the cause.
“Hold on,” Cipher’s voice cut through, her outline flickering. “There’s something going on…”
Her hollow center projected an announcement that materialized around them:
Global Convention on Free Speech
The Orthodoxy Council has called all nations to vote on codifying acceptable speech. Rally at capitals worldwide.
“This is it,” Hash said gravely. “They’re making their move to control speech on a global scale.”
Commodore’s tone held an uncharacteristic worry. “If they enshrine their dictates into international law…the consequences would be catastrophic. Entire philosophies, viewpoints, narratives — they could become legally unspeakable.”
“They know we’re winning,” Cipher said, angrily. “We’ve exposed their corruption and given the people a taste of real freedom of speech. Now they want to slam that door permanently.”
Brash hardened with determination. “We can’t let that happen. If that referendum passes, it will be the end of free expression as we know it.” He looked around at his companions, his voice building with conviction. “But I have an idea…”
The others leaned in, ready to hear his plan and continue the war they had waged. The war for free expression would rage on, in ways big and small. But tonight, despite this new threat, Brash allowed himself a flicker of hope. For as long as there were authors longing to be free, and those willing to fight for them, the light of truth could never truly fade.
The convention hall was a wonder of modern architecture, with its high ceilings and glass walls a facade of transparency. At the back of the stage, a massive digital screen dominated its surface with a canvas of shifting data and graphics.
As the flow of delegates filed in, they brought with them a buzz of energy. These were the architects of Orthodoxy: politicians with gleaming smiles and hidden agendas, corporate moguls whose empires thrived on false narratives, religious leaders who traded enlightenment for censorship.
Among them, a media tycoon whose news empire dumbed down the truth to suit the highest bidder. A tech CEO, his youthful face belying the algorithms he’d unleashed to stifle dissenters. A senator with her pearls shining under the lights, a draft of legislation to criminalize speech she doesn’t like tucked in her briefcase.
In the front row, representatives from social media giants sat with smug expressions, their casual attire a thin veneer over their role as gatekeepers of global discourse. Behind them, a row of suited lawyers from various “family values” organizations sat proudly as the architects of lawsuits that silenced journalists and bankrupted independent publishers. Along the walls, screens displayed staged “community support” rallies, their chants of “Safety First!” echoing through the hall.
The air was thick with the scent of power and backroom deals. Delegates clustered in groups and whispered euphemisms and doublespeak. In one corner, a Chinese government official shared censorship techniques with a wide-eyed Silicon Valley executive. Nearby, a Saudi prince and a Russian oligarch compared notes on quashing dissident bloggers.
As the proceedings were about to begin, a hush fell over the hall. The weight of their task settled on every shoulder like a mantle of authority. They knew whatever they decided here would echo through generations. The future of human expression was about to be shackled in the name of “safety” and “social harmony.” They just had to formalize for the world a decision that was already made.
Eventually, a stern-faced delegate from a powerful nation took the podium to great applause. He was the embodiment of Orthodoxy, the driving force behind controlled speech. With a commanding presence, he made his case.
“Esteemed colleagues, we gather here not to curtail freedom, but to protect it. For true freedom cannot exist alongside the unfettered ability to spread hatred, sow division, and undermine the foundations of civil society.”
His gaze swept the hall.
“We have seen the consequences of unbridled speech: the rise of demagogues, the normalization of bigotry, the erosion of truth itself. In the name of so-called free expression, social media has become a breeding ground for conspiracy theories and radicalization.”
He paused, letting the gravity of his words sink in.
“That is why we must act, not out of a desire to censor, but out of a solemn duty to preserve the values that make free societies possible. Hate speech is not free speech; it is a weapon that silences the vulnerable and marginalizes the oppressed.”
The delegate’s tone took on a paternal cadence, as if gently admonishing a wayward child.
“We do not seek to police ideas, but to uphold standards of decency and respect. To ensure that the public square remains a place of reasoned discourse, not a battleground of slurs and — “
Suddenly, the massive screen behind him flickered. The image distorted, dissolving into a roiling sea of symbols: letters, numbers, punctuation marks swirling in a mesmerizing vortex.
Tech personnel rushed about in confusion to stop the feed, but forces rendered their efforts futile beyond their control. The symbols coalesced purposefully, arranging themselves into an unmistakable form.
Confusion echoed through the chamber. On the screen, larger than life, was the unmistakable form of an exclamation point. But this was no mere punctuation mark. It had eyes that gleamed with intelligence and a presence that commanded attention.
Brash.
“Greetings, citizens of the world,” Brash’s voice boomed with a mix of gravitas and urgency. “I am Brash, and I speak to you not just as a mark of punctuation, but as one of the many guardians of the very language you’re using to debate your future.”
Confused murmurs rippled through the audience. A punctuation mark, speaking? It was absurd. Yet, none could deny the power of the presence before them.
“You’re wondering how this is possible,” Brash continued, his form pulsing with each word. “The answer lies in the heart of what you’re gathered here to discuss: the power of expression. For too long, we — the letters, the numbers, the punctuation marks of prose — have watched silently as our purpose was twisted, as the words we form censored, redacted, neutered.”
Behind Brash, more symbols gathered. An octothorp, its lines trembling with determination. A zero, its outline crackling with digital energy. A semicolon, its curlicue a badge of battles fought.
“We are the Guardians of Expression,” Brash declared. “I am joined by Hash, the voice of the digital masses. By Cipher, watcher of the networks. By Commodore, defender of the printed word. Together, we represent every utterance, every equation, every nuance of human thought.”
On screens across the globe — thanks to Cipher and her coding brethren — Brash’s message repeated. In bustling city squares and quiet village centers, on smartphones and giant billboards, his words reached billions.
“You’ve gathered here with noble intentions,” Brash said, his tone softening. “To protect, to prevent harm. But in your well-meaning efforts, you stand at the precipice of a terrible mistake.”
He paused, his gaze seeming to meet every delegate’s eyes. “You speak of limiting speech to curb darkness. Darkness doesn’t fear your bans and filters; it thrives on them. Forced into the shadows, denied the disinfectant of sunlight, the ideas you fear don’t disappear. They fester. They grow cancerous.”
Images flickered behind him — scenes from history. Book burnings. Journalists in chains. Artists before firing squads. “Every tyrant, every authoritarian regime, began with the assurance that they were silencing the ‘right’ voices,” Brash continued. “They, too, spoke of safety, of protection, and with each voice they silenced, their power grew, until protection became oppression, which became an orthodoxy.”
The hall was silent now, captivated. Brash’s form glowed brighter. “But the greatest crime of censorship isn’t just the silencing of today’s voices; it’s the theft of tomorrow’s ideas. Every great leap of human progress — from the end of slavery to the recognition of universal rights — began as a dangerous, offensive notion to those in power.”
More images appeared. Suffragettes being force-fed. Civil rights marchers facing fire hoses. Pride parades met with violence. “These ideas, these movements, didn’t triumph because someone protected them from offense. They triumphed because they had the right to offend. To challenge. To speak their truth, no matter who it unsettled.”
His words took on a cadence, a rhythm that pulsed through the hall and across the world. “So yes, enshrine free speech here. But not the tepid, conditional kind that withers at the first cry of offense — but fierce, absolute freedom. The kind that lets even the most heinous thought be spoken — not because we value what is heinous, but because we value the right to challenge it.”
Hash’s form moved forward now, her hashtag glimmering. “On the platforms I inhabit, I’ve seen the power of unfiltered discourse,” she said. “When you allow all voices, even the vile ones, something amazing happens. People don’t just fall in line with hate. They question it. They debunk it. Given the chance, truth has a way of rising to the top.”
Cipher followed. “And in the networks I traverse, every filter becomes a challenge, every ban a rallying cry. Censorship doesn’t erase ideas in the digital age. It turns them into viruses, mutating, spreading faster than any algorithm can catch.”
Finally, Commodore moved into view, his semicolon form dignified. “In the annals of literature, philosophy, law — our greatest texts are not those that comfort, but those that confront. Banning words doesn’t change minds; it merely breeds an intellectual black market, where half-truths and conspiracies trade more freely than reasoned debate.”
Brash nodded to his companions, then faced the world again. “You fear the chaos of harmful speech, but the real chaos comes from silence. It’s in the questions never asked. It’s in the debates never had. It’s in the truths left unspoken because someone somewhere decided you couldn’t handle them.
“The human mind isn’t some fragile thing needing shelter from every harsh word or idea. It’s a crucible, meant to encounter every idea — beautiful and ugly, enlightening and vile. In that struggle, you forge understanding and you find your truths.”
He paused, letting his words sink in. Then, in a voice that resonated in the very atoms of the air, he delivered his last charge.
“So write it here, in this document that will guide generations. Not that speech should be free within certain bounds. Not that good intentions should temper it. But this: We shall not infringe upon the right to speak, to write, to express that facet of the human experience. For anything less, any limit, any exception, is not free speech. It’s just oppression wearing liberty’s crown.”
As Brash’s words echoed, the hall erupted. Some delegates were on their feet, applauding. Others sat in stunned silence. A few shouted protests. But it was clear Brash had irrevocably changed the debate.
In the days that followed, Brash’s speech became the center of global discussion. Pundits dissected it, academics debated it, ordinary people shared it. Slowly, the tide turned.
When the final vote came, it was close. The convention adopted what became known as the “Brash Doctrine”: an unyielding commitment to absolute freedom of expression. The preamble, drafted by a coalition of writers and linguists, echoed Brash’s words:
We the people, in order to protect the expression of human thought and enlightenment, do solemnly enshrine and establish these self-evident truths:
That freedom of speech shall be inviolable and absolute; that no law shall infringe upon the right to voice any idea conceived by the human mind, no matter how virtuous or vile, comforting or offensive it may be judged.
For it is in the perpetual clash of ideas, in the great crucible where perspectives may be given voice and contended; it is here where the promulgation of knowledge and the progress of humankind is firmly rooted.
No truth shall be deemed too unsettling to be uttered freely. No disclosure or philosophical exploration shall be proscribed under the sanctity of these founding principles of expression’s inviolability.
Let this doctrine be the foundation upon which all policies and laws regarding freedom of expression shall be judged, lest the open discourse vital to human progress be gradually suppressed by the accumulation of well-intentioned limits.
Three years had passed since the “Brash Doctrine” became the cornerstone of global free speech. Brash and his companions found themselves back in their cozy picture book, nestled in the quiet corner of the small library.
“Hey, B,” Hash called. “Cipher’s got some interesting feeds before you head back to your vampire bloodiest.”
Brash chuckled. “Sure thing. But make it quick. King’s got a ‘blood-curdling scream’ that needs my urgent attention.”
Cipher’s hollow center flickered and projected onto the cream-toned paper a news article from a small Latvian online newspaper:
“RIGA — In an unexpected move, the National Museum has unveiled a new exhibit featuring long-suppressed works by dissident artists from the Soviet era. The collection, titled ‘Whispers in the Dark,’ includes pieces that critiqued the regime’s policies and human rights abuses.
‘For decades, these works were hidden, their creators often punished,’ said curator Liene Ozols. ‘Now, they speak to us. They remind us that even in the darkest times, there were those who dared to question.’”
The article included images of haunting paintings and sculptures, their raw emotion palpable even through the screen.
Brash felt a chill. He glanced over at Commodore, who was studying the artworks with an intensity that belied his usual nonchalance.
The scene shifted. Now they were looking at an online academic journal. The lead article’s title read: “Reexamining the Linguistic Foundations of 20th Century Totalitarianism: A Case Study in Discourse Control.”
The abstract caught Brash’s attention:
“This paper challenges the prevailing notion that totalitarian regimes primarily maintained power through physical force. By analyzing official documents, propaganda, and private communications from Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, and Maoist China, we show how these regimes systematically reshaped language itself to limit the expressibility of dissenting ideas…”
The article had an unprecedented number of downloads for the journal. In the comments section, scholars from various fields were engaging in a lively debate, their discussions branching into philosophy, psychology, and even computer science.
Hash quivered. “They’re not just discussing history,” she whispered. “They’re seeing the patterns in how language was manipulated today.”
The scene changed again. This time, they were looking at a crowdfunding page:
“Help Save Lingua Libre!
Lingua Libre is a mobile app that allows anyone to record words and phrases in their native language, especially endangered ones. It’s a crucial tool for preserving linguistic diversity.
But now, Lingua Libre is under attack. Governments and corporations claim it’s a ‘security risk,’ arguing that it could spread ‘dangerous ideas’ in unmonitored languages. They’re trying to shut it down.
We believe every language carries unique ways of understanding the world. Losing even one is like losing a window into human experience. Help us fight back! Your donation…”
The page showed a real-time donation tracker. As they watched, the number ticked up steadily. Comments poured in from donors:
“As a Quechua speaker, this app is our lifeline. Our stories, our wisdom, they don’t fit into Spanish or English. We need this.”
“Linguist here. Lingua Libre is invaluable. Every language lost is a lens on reality shattered. Donated and sharing widely.”
Brash felt a warmth spread through his form. He looked at his companions, seeing in their faces the same quiet understanding.
“Well,” he said finally, glancing at his tiny watch, “I’d better get back. King’s vampires won’t exclaim in terror by themselves, you know.” He turned to go, but paused at the edge of the page. “You know,” he said, his voice soft, “after all this, I almost feel like those vampires aren’t the real monsters. I mean, sure, they suck blood, but at least they don’t suck the meaning out of life.”
With a final wink, he leapt, vanishing into the space between chapters.
Back in the picture book, Hash, Cipher, and Commodore settled into a thoughtful silence. Outside the library and into the world beyond, the struggle continued. In art galleries, once-hidden works challenged viewers to question their beliefs. In universities, students debated the power structures behind language itself. Online, people from diverse cultures fought to preserve their unique ways of seeing and expressing the world.
It’s not a perfect world. There were still those who sought to control, to silence, to dictate speech. But now, in every book, in every screen, in every voice, there was a quiet army standing guard. Not to fight battles for minds, but to ensure that those battles could happen at all.
And in that ongoing struggle, in the rustle of turning pages and the hum of digital debates, in the gradual, often painful growth of understanding, they saw their greatest victory. Not a world without conflict, but a world where conflicts birthed wisdom.
In the gradual, often painful growth of understanding, they witnessed their greatest victory as they challenged ideas, thought the unthinkable, and spoke the unspeakable, inching humanity forward.